The "End of History" ideology is a concept popularized by political scientist Francis Fukuyama in his 1992 book "The End of History and the Last Man."
In his book, Fukuyama argued that with the end of the Cold War and the collapse of Soviet-style communism, liberal democracy and market capitalism had triumphed as the ultimate and final form of human government and socioeconomic organization.
He believed that further ideological evolution had come to an end, suggesting that liberal democracy represented the "end point of mankind's ideological evolution."
However, it's important to note that Fukuyama's thesis has been widely debated and criticized. Some scholars see his assertion as neo-evangelism, while others view his opinion as childish proclamation.
Many scholars and thinkers have argued that history is not over and that new challenges and ideologies continue to emerge.
The world remains dynamic and unpredictable, with ongoing political, economic, and social developments. New ideologies are emerging competing for the minds of the global audiences.
In summary, the "End of History" ideology is a controversial concept that posits that liberal democracy and capitalism represent the ultimate and final stage of human political and economic development, but it remains a subject of ongoing debate and critique.
This is so because the emergence of BRICS and the rising Asian Oligarchs has polarized the world ushering a new way for new world order.
Finally, millitary has ousted more than two democratic in the west African countries in the recent time. The transitions emerged from the weaknesses of the liberal democratic leaders in continent who had dispayed clear evidences of corruption and selfish Governance etc.
Comments
Post a Comment