Skip to main content

Posts

Reinterpreting Marx in Nigeria

The intellectual turn towards The Postmodern Marx , most notably advanced by political theorist and historian of political thought, Terrell Carver, represents a significant shift in the study of Marxist thought. Rather than viewing Marx as a deterministic thinker concerned solely with economic laws and historical inevitability, Carver emphasizes the interpretive, textual, and discursive nature of Marx’s writings. This approach aligns with postmodern theory, which challenges fixed meanings, essential categories, and universal explanations. Instead, it foregrounds ambiguity, context, and the constructed nature of political and social identities. In the Nigerian context, this re-reading of Marx is not only timely but essential. Traditional Marxist models—rooted in binaries such as bourgeoisie and proletariat—struggle to account for the country’s complex socio-political fabric. Since independence, Nigerian society has been shaped by colonial legacies, ethnic federalism, military ...

Postmodern Marx

The concept of Postmodern Marx , as articulated by political theorist Terrell Carver, represents a significant departure from traditional, rigid interpretations of Karl Marx’s thought. Rather than reading Marx as a scientific economist or deterministic prophet of class struggle, postmodern scholars view his writings as open, interpretive texts shaped by language, ambiguity, and historical context. In this framework, Marx is not a singular authority but a thinker whose ideas must be continually re-read in light of changing cultural and political realities. This postmodern approach is particularly valuable when applied to Nigeria, a country whose complex postcolonial condition defies simplistic class models. Traditional Marxism often posits a binary between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Yet, Nigeria’s political economy is characterized not just by capitalist exploitation, but by a hybrid system involving ethnic patronage, informal markets, religious networks, and state-dependent ...

Affirmative Action in Nigerian Politics

 Affirmative action is a policy or set of measures designed to address historical and systemic inequalities by promoting the inclusion and representation of marginalized or disadvantaged groups—such as women, ethnic minorities, or people with disabilities—in areas like education, employment, and political participation. Its primary aim is to level the playing field by providing opportunities that help correct imbalances caused by past discrimination or structural barriers. In political contexts, affirmative action can involve mechanisms such as quotas, reserved seats, or targeted appointments to ensure fair representation and foster social equity in governance and decision-making processes.  Affirmative action in Nigerian politics is both a product of historical necessity and a reflection of the country’s complex ethnic, regional, and gender dynamics. Emerging from a colonial legacy that entrenched disparities among the North, West, and East, Nigeria’s post-independence politi...

The TIV Political Dominance in Benue

Since the advent of civilian rule in 1979, the Tiv ethnic group has maintained an unbroken dominance over the most significant political offices in Benue State. This enduring control reflects a deliberate political culture in which the Tiv assert themselves not merely as a majority, but as custodians of the state’s leadership. While ethnic majoritarianism is not unique to Benue, the Tiv posture has often manifested as an implicit belief that no other ethnic group is entitled to the governorship or similarly influential offices. However, what complicates this political history is the conspicuous absence of transformative development tied to this long-standing rule. Despite decades of control, key socio-economic indicators remain stagnant or regressive. This has raised difficult questions about the utility of ethnic dominance when it is not matched by institutional progress or inclusive governance. Historians and political observers alike continue to interrogate this legacy of power wit...

A little Tribute to the late President Muhammadu Buhari

 The eagle has descended from the northern firmament, and silence, profound and ancient, now lingers where once the voice of command resounded. Muhammadu Buhari—soldier, statesman, enigma—has taken his final bow from the grand stage of Nigeria’s turbulent history. His journey traced the arc of a man both cast in iron and carved by paradox: at once the stoic guardian of order and the inscrutable architect of silence. From khaki to civilian garb, his presence loomed like the harmattan—unyielding, austere, purifying to some, wounding to others. He returned to power not on the back of tanks but on the fragile wings of democracy, bearing promises of change and restoration. Yet with time, the broom that once swept through the hopes of millions seemed to falter, as dust gathered in corners untouched. His war against corruption became a riddle; his silence, louder than his proclamations. Legacy now stands, a two-faced Janus: one gazing toward discipline, the other toward disillusion. Still...

On Late President Muhammadu Buhari's Death

 The death of former President Muhammadu Buhari would carry deep symbolic and political weight, especially for northern Nigeria. As a key figure representing northern interests and conservative values, his passing could create a leadership vacuum and spark internal realignments within the northern elite. It may weaken northern political influence temporarily, embolden southern blocs to assert more power, and intensify regional rivalry. While some northerners may use his legacy to rally for continued dominance, southerners may criticize his tenure to push for southern leadership. Ultimately, his death could reshape alliances and deepen North-South tensions in the contest for national political power.

Stop drinking dirty water

 When someone says, “If you drink dirty water, it changes your health and it changes your economic,” they are making an important point about how poor water quality affects both personal well-being and economic stability . Let’s break this down: 1. It changes your health: Dirty water often contains harmful bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause diseases like cholera, dysentery, typhoid , and diarrhea . Frequent illness reduces physical strength, mental alertness , and overall quality of life . Poor health can also lead to malnutrition , especially in children. 2. It changes your economic (situation): Medical bills increase when you're sick more often. People lose working days or even jobs due to illness. Parents may spend money and time caring for sick children instead of working. Sick children may miss school , affecting their future earning potential . Communities with poor water often struggle to attract investment or development . In summa...